The 13th Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) of Foreign Ministers (ASEM FMM) took place in Myanmar on 20-21 November 2017, against the backdrop of the plight of the Rohingyas in the Rahkine state in Myanmar. The exodus of hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees into neighbouring Bangladesh and the unfolding humanitarian crisis made it impossible to be ignored by the ASEM ministers. While the human rights situation in the Rakhine state did not make it to the official agenda of the 13th ASEM FMM, efforts were made by both Asian and European foreign ministers on the sidelines of the meeting to help bring about a long term solution to the crisis. Click on the image to read more.
The collapse of Germany’s coalition talks on Sunday (19 Nov) is the latest shock to hit Europe and has raised concerns that the European Union’s (EU) biggest country will send the bloc into paralysis. This is a 180 degree turn from fears of a “German Europe”- German domination of the EU – to worries on what will happen to EU reforms and policies without a strong German hand. Click on the image to read more.
In a 200-minute speech full of jargons and clichés, Chinese president Xi Jinping in his address to the 19th Party Congress not only lauded what had been achieved by the party since the 18th Party Congress in 2012, but also announced the advent of a new era for China to become a truly influential country in the world, one that all Chinese can be proud of. However, this great socialist modernization of China will only be achieved in a two-stage plan. From 2020 to 2035 China will be transformed into a modern, innovative socialist country, with strong economic and scientific power delivering on improved livelihood for the people and closing of the urban-rural income disparity. And from 2035 to 2050, China will establish itself as a Great Power, a prosperous and influential country in the world, fulfilling the long-awaited “Chinese Dream” of national rejuvenation. Click on the image to read more.
After the ECJ’s ruled on the “mixity” of the EUSFTA in May, hopes are high for Singapore to benefit from freer access to Europe and for the deal to serve as a template for a region-to-region EU-ASEAN FTA. Yet, many worry that European-style product-specific rules of origin would be problematic for Singapore which thrives on foreign inputs and for ASEAN countries with weak institutional capacities to administer the agreement. Is there any truth to these concerns? Click on the image to read more.
After almost a decade since the great financial crisis hit the European Union (EU), leading to a spiral of events that dented the confidence of the EU, things maybe looking a little brighter. Economic recovery is finally gaining strength and European businesses surveyed by McKinsey Global Institute expect the EU to grow by 2% over the next five years. Chinese and American companies are even more upbeat than their European counterparts on the growth trajectory of the EU expecting GDP to grow between 2.3% to 3%. Click on the image to read more.
On 16 May 2017, the Court of Justice, the highest court in the European Union, ruled that the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (EUSFTA) is a mixed agreement and would therefore require ratifications not only by EU institutions but also by the national and regional parliaments of EU member states. This final ruling in itself is not a surprise since last December, a non-binding opinion delivered by the Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston indicated that the EUSFTA can only be concluded by the EU and Member states acting jointly. What is perhaps surprising is that contrary to the opinion, the final court ruling only sets out two investments issues over which there is shared competence between the EU and its member states and hence would require approval by the parliaments of the member states. Click on the image to read more about the commentary.
The EU released a White Paper last week delineating five possible future scenarios of European integration. The Big Four – Germany, France, Italy and Spain – of the EU27 announced on Monday that they endorse the vision of a multi-speed Europe. While the proposal may be supported by some other Western EU member states, several former Eastern bloc members, in particular the Visegrad Group opposed the idea as they believed the proposal risks splitting the EU. Click on the image to read more.
2016 was a tough year for the EU. The greatest shock was the Brexit vote in June. Other crises included the EU’s relations with Russia, the migrant / refugee crisis and terrorism. All these challenges fed into rising discontent leading to increased support for populist, xenophobic and nationalistic parties and backlash against globalisation. What will 2017 look like for the EU? This year-end commentary by Dr Yeo Lay Hwee provides different scenarios and end with a cautiously optimistic note on the resilience of the EU.
Dr Yeo Lay Hwee, Director of EU Centre, contributed a short commentary on “Why the EU matters to ASEAN” to the Special August Issue of ASEAN Focus, published by the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. Please click on the feature image to read the commentary.
On 23 June, the British people chose to leave the EU. To know more about the immediate repercussions and potential implications of this Brexit vote, please click on the feature image to read EU Centre Director Dr Yeo Lay Hwee’s latest commentary.